WASHINGTON, D.C. – In our nation’s capital, where politics govern the nation, the politics of Washington, D.C. itself could change. President Donald Trump threatened to take federal control of DC because crime is “out of control”. If DC is so-called “federalized” again, it could have an impact on the work of Congress.
In a Truth Social post, the President said crime in Washington, dc is “totally out of control”. This follows an alleged attempted carjacking and beating of a former DOGE staffer. The President pointed the finger at 14- to 16-year-olds for issues with crime, even saying they should be prosecuted as adults. Juvenile crime remains a concern in D.C. even with total violent crime was down by 35 percent in 2024 compared to the year prior.
“In 2023 violent crime and homicides rates dropped significantly last year so one of the lowest rates of violent crime in the United States in half a century,” said Rep. Joe Morelle (D- NY) in a 2024 congressional hearing on crime and safety in D.C. “Unfortunately, the District of Columbia has been an exception to the rule.”
Crime in D.C. has even been the focus of congressional hearings. Members on both sides have aired concerns.
“I think we can all agree whether you’re here for a tour of the capital or to meet with your Representative, every visitor deserves to be safe,” said Rep. Bryan Steil (R- WI) during that same hearing.
The President once again threatened he would “federalize this city” if the crime continues. So, what does that mean for our nation’s capital? Since the 1970s, the District’s residents have had a limited degree of self-governance, like electing a mayor and city council members who enact local laws. This is known as D.C.’s “Home Rule”. Before this law, it was Congress that governed the district. Before Home Rule was enacted, Congressional members who were sent to D.C. to manage their home districts were also getting calls about D.C. local affairs: from public safety, to education, even trash pickup and filling potholes. Some argue before home rule, there was a lack of responsiveness to local D.C. residents’ needs.
If congress rescinds that law, which some GOP members have expressed interest in earlier this year, some argue congress could tighten their grip on D.C.’s crime problem. But others argue Home Rule gives locals the ability to address their own needs and issues and electing local leaders to address those concerns.
